mahalisyarifuddin

Don't mind me. I'm just testing the sorta "autocorrect" feature in this site.

M4 is still a thing?

It surely is!

I really want to finish college stuffs, get a job, and get paid so badly.

I wanna say it's because it's not "meta" and if it's not "Meta" it must then be a terrible bank and not usable...When in actuality it probably is a really good voicebank and is usable. (simplest explanation I can think of)

I think it might be because it's just always been hiragana from the beginning afaik. Because of that, most VCV USTs are hiragana, most VBs are hiragana, and plugins like the Lyric Diphonizer are made for it (it doesn't work with romaji). Maybe that was because VCV hiragana was easier for Japanese users? I don't know why it is the way it is.

If it was in romaji from the start, the issue would probably be reversed. I'm not sure if people are explicitly against romaji. It's more like it's not common enough to be "worth it," if that makes sense. That's only from what I've seen, though; maybe people are genuinely against it, but I have no idea. Sorry for the double comment, it wouldn't fit in one.

I really recommend this method! And yeah, if my friends or family interested in making an Utau bank, I'll make them record with this method wwww

Or I could say, a bit more unique in terms of otoing style.

The most notable is the [V C] that the white area don't really matter, which is less time consuming in oto in one side, but really annoying in usting in another side.

Yeah, I don't really bothered when people "slapped the brand on the phonetically different language". As long as they keep the otoing "method", that's okay. And that brand is not copyrighted anyway.

But when its just "your generic CVVC", it would be different story.