New topic: What are some of the challenges you think VCCV encounters?
I think the level of visibility is small, but this is a relatively new language for UTAU. I also think not a lot of ust to choose from plays a roll. Also, just gaining respect. People have this notion that a voice-bank is going to be 100% comprehensible. The reality is that actual singers are sometime incomprehensible when they sing and we need the guidance of lyrics. I can understand it the voice bank is muffled or something. I think English voice banks are under harsher criticism than Japanese voice banks. But that what I think
I think that maybe we need to understand that VCCV, while really good, is probably still a stepping stone. I think VCCV may be the CVVC of english. It is good, but I think VCV English will need to become a standard too. At the very least there needs to be a longer VCCV with every begging and end note in it, because CCV notes are the most likely to mess up.
right now were at a point that is similar to when I joined utau in 2012. People were happy to record CV banks because VCV was "too many" notes. Some started recording VCV, but VCV multipitch was pretty uncommon. People started warming up to the idea more when multipitch VCV started really showing how amazing it was through songs like +Reverse. No somebody using CV regularly is uncommon. (though if anything ENG CV-VC is like JPN CV,and ENG VC-CV is like JPN CVVC) People need to get used to the idea that really fluent english is going to take more recording than they are used to.
that being said, it is true that sometimes lyrics are needed to understand english singers too. VCCV is pretty understandable in slow and medium songs, it's just fast songs that make it harder.